Skip to main content
Quantitative Finance

Return to Answer

replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 1

I believe it is possible that those lists can be an addition to Quant.SE, despite the broad scope. For example this worked great, up to some point: http://stackoverflow.com/posts/392926/revisionshttps://stackoverflow.com/posts/392926/revisions

If we were to have such a list a lot of low quality questions can be avoided. Not only that, even seasoned quants can use such a list as a reference or to learn about unfamiliar topics.

I believe it is possible that those lists can be an addition to Quant.SE, despite the broad scope. For example this worked great, up to some point: http://stackoverflow.com/posts/392926/revisions

If we were to have such a list a lot of low quality questions can be avoided. Not only that, even seasoned quants can use such a list as a reference or to learn about unfamiliar topics.

I believe it is possible that those lists can be an addition to Quant.SE, despite the broad scope. For example this worked great, up to some point: https://stackoverflow.com/posts/392926/revisions

If we were to have such a list a lot of low quality questions can be avoided. Not only that, even seasoned quants can use such a list as a reference or to learn about unfamiliar topics.

Source Link
Bob Jansen Mod
Bob Jansen Mod
  • 8.6k
  • 13
  • 18

I believe it is possible that those lists can be an addition to Quant.SE, despite the broad scope. For example this worked great, up to some point: http://stackoverflow.com/posts/392926/revisions

If we were to have such a list a lot of low quality questions can be avoided. Not only that, even seasoned quants can use such a list as a reference or to learn about unfamiliar topics.