4
$\begingroup$

This question and Chris W. Rea's comment motivated me to create Finance (including Behavioural, Corporate, Public Finance)

Please allow me to advert to it here and advise me if this affronts or afflicts anyone and forgive me.

It's intended to be more general and catholic, but equally as instructive and useful, as the present finance websites. Moreover, I aspire for it to welcome, appertain to, and assist with subjects and topics esteemed "off-topic" on the current finance websites, and thus to complete any lacunae or rifts in content and coverage.

Please feel free to contribute, support, and opine on it. I will be grateful for them.

(I can't seem to post this on Meta. Would a moderator please relocate this there?)

$\endgroup$

migrated from quant.stackexchange.com Feb 23 '14 at 15:55

This question came from our site for finance professionals and academics.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ belongs on meta $\endgroup$ – user2763361 Feb 23 '14 at 15:30
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This is a great idea! $\endgroup$ – madilyn Feb 23 '14 at 19:20
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Any progress so far? $\endgroup$ – madilyn Mar 1 '14 at 20:24
3
$\begingroup$

This would be a great idea and I greatly support it. I don't believe it is a duplicate of the Quantitative Finance SE. Here's a few reasons why:

  1. @LePressentiment is proposing a site for finance professionals, whereas quant SE has always been something else.

  2. The scope of this SE is very poorly defined and is, seemingly, being exploited for personal agenda.

  3. This SE is unsustainable and can't grow organically.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ why not integrate behavioral finance into quant SE :) $\endgroup$ – Probilitator Mar 6 '14 at 15:14

You must log in to answer this question.